Time Magazine's Mark Halperin evaluated Paul's performance as "crowd-pleasing," and, added that "if the Republicans nominated a candidate based on who most moved the applause meter, Paul would be giving his acceptance speech next summer."
View the following video to see the performance that garnered yet another landslide victory:
This was obviously biased!
I watched the debate and they completely ignored Ron Paul when they were talking about the Fair Tax. Ron Paul has been consistently voted National Taxpayer's Best Friend by the National Taxpayer's Association and has been praised by other taxpayer organizations. Not to mention that he has extensive knowledge about monetary policy and arguably has more knowledge about this subject than any other Presidential candidate. Putting aside past experiences, he currently serves in the Committee on Financial Services and the Joint Economic Committee. He is vice-chairman of the Oversight and Investigations subcommittee of the Financial Services Committee and also serves on the Subcommittee on Domestic Monetary Policy, Technology, and Economic Growth. Despite his current experience, they ignored him on taxes and the economy.
When they were asking the candidates about health-care, again, they completely ignored him. He's the only MD(medical-doctor) among both the Democratic field and Republican field, yet this is the fourth debate where they didn't ask him a single thing about health-care. His medical career dates back to 1963 and he has even continued to practice medicine as a congressman. Despite his experience as a doctor, not a single question about health-care.
It seems to portray him as if he was a one-issue candidate on the Iraq war, but he's far from being a one-issue candidate.
* This website is neither approved nor funded by any political candidate!